|
Considering that these so-called "dangerous" Explorer's are 2WD, yes, indeed, it will have it's disadvantages in ice vs. the 2WD CR-V's -- since the Explorer (Sport as depicted in the picture) is rear-wheel drive while the CR-V is front-wheel drive. i have had a 4WD CR-V and has rode with Bing and the gang on offroad trails, sand, snow and ice on the V, and I cannot help but praise Honda for an excellent vehicle. However, i drive a 2001 Explorer Sport now. The V6 on the Explorer really made a lot of difference. when i had my 1999 CR-V, i thought the 146hp was sufficient enough. but after numerous trips from Los Angeles to Las Vegas over mountainenous terrain, the 4 banger just couldn't cut it satisfactorily (5 adults in the vehicle).
however, i have experienced this "dangerous" side of the Explorer. when forced to drive offroad to avoid a freeway that became a parking lot due to an accident. i did a 360 spin over a big puddle of mud that i knew had i had my trusty V would have been a cinch to cross! needless to say, my Explorer is a two wheeler, if it were a 4WD, i would have cut through that mud like a hot knife over butter.
the rear-wheel drive Explorer with it's straight axle and leaf suspension is antiquated! i'm sorry, even though i drive this vehicle everyday, i don't feel as safe as driving the V. a BIGGER engine really helps, but that would defeat the CR-V's goal as an economical vehicle - which is a totally different issue. the new Explorers with independent suspension and auto/hi/low 4wd tranny would definitely be a safer vehicle (but i cannot comment on them, coz i have never driven them).
but then again, you cannot compare the Explorers to the CR-V's. it's like comparing apples to oranges. the people that are shopping for CR-V's are not interested in the price range of the 4-door Explorers. and the people shopping for Explorer's are not interested in the CR-V's cargo room.
totally different vehicle, for totally different individuals. kinda reminds me when KIA ran commercials on TV showing how the CR-V was not a capable OFFROAD vehicle. what the heck were they thinking? the CR-V was NEVER marketed to be an offroad vehicle in the first place.
what gives?
|